<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nicky Cheese &#187; two party monopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/tag/two-party-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickycheese.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>You are more than mere automaton!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ex-National Review publisher endorses Obama&#8230;no mention of Barr</title>
		<link>http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/old-national-review-publisher-endorses-obamano-mention-of-barr/</link>
		<comments>http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/old-national-review-publisher-endorses-obamano-mention-of-barr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Cheese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AC/DC Obama shirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative Obama endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex National Review publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harebrained tee shirts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harebrained.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old national review publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two party monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wick Allison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you weren&#8217;t already aware, I&#8217;m a twin. Fraternal. And that&#8217;s his artwork to the left.
As you can tell, the twin&#8217;s quite the artist&#8230;and, yes, quite the lib. But &#8211; admit it &#8211; for an Obama shirt, it&#8217;s pretty badass. I mean, an AC/DC reference? Genius!
Moreover, it lacks the nauseating messianic dimension that everything else [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.harebrained.org/Harebrained%21/Barack.html"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-281" style="float: left" src="http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/files/2008/09/barack_blue-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>If you weren&#8217;t already aware, I&#8217;m a twin. Fraternal. And that&#8217;s his artwork to the left.</p>
<p>As you can tell, the twin&#8217;s quite the artist&#8230;and, yes, quite the lib. But &#8211; admit it &#8211; for an Obama shirt, it&#8217;s pretty badass. I mean, an AC/DC reference? Genius!</p>
<p>Moreover, it lacks the nauseating messianic dimension that everything else Obama-branded has.</p>
<p>Anyways, for the last few years, I&#8217;ve been pushing my libertarianism on him pretty solid &#8211; and, for the last year, my active disinterest/dismissal of Obama &#8211; so it was only inevitable he&#8217;d try to shut me up with something convincing.</p>
<p>Last week, he shot me an email with a link to Wick Allison&#8217;s &#8211; ex-publisher for National Review and current editor in chief for D Magazine &#8211; <a href="http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?nm=Core+Pages&amp;type=gen&amp;mod=Core+Pages&amp;tier=3&amp;gid=B33A5C6E2CF04C9596A3EF81822D9F8E"><em>A Conservative for Obama</em></a>.</p>
<p>I read it. Yeah, not convinced.</p>
<p>The editorial actually starts off quite strong, describing the abstract difference between conservatism and liberalism and then going on to show how Bush&#8217;s tax cuts (without subsequent spending cuts) and foreign policy are unsound political moves. Totally agree.</p>
<p>But then, after associating these unsound policies with McCain (a move I more or less agree with), Allison immediately shifts to an empty endorsement of Obama, citing his intellect, strong rhetoric/speaking skills, and pragmatism as reasons for doing so. Nothing else. Obama was, apparently, that easy of a decision for Wick. After all, it&#8217;s him or McCain!</p>
<p>To which I have to respond with a big ole&#8217; bullshit! These are not the only options and, Wick, you know it.</p>
<p>What about Bob Barr? I lament: WHAT ABOUT BOB BARR!?!</p>
<p>This Wick Allison guy is ex-National Review. How can he not mention, not even in passing, Bob Barr?</p>
<p>Bob Barr&#8217;s foreign policy? Arguably isolationist. Spending? He&#8217;ll veto everything and anything! And questions regarding how Barr thinks it is &#8220;America’s job is to &#8216;defeat evil,&#8217; a theological expansion of the nation’s mission&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think so. Bob cites my girl Ayn Rand all the time!</p>
<p>This is your man, Wick. Unless you address the issue, I am left to assume that your editorial is just a pathetic attempt to get some traffic to an online news source that no one&#8217;s every heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nickycheese.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/old-national-review-publisher-endorses-obamano-mention-of-barr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
